Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Boruch Clinton's avatar

> "I have heard pushback that it won’t be able to answer personal questions because it does not know you personally"

That "pushback" assumes that today's human poskim know you personally. In most large communities (like Lakewood), however, finding a first-rank rav who actually knows you (and has the time to get involved in your sha'ala) is the rare exception.

But as I've written, the question isn't really whether using AI for psak is a good idea or not, but how long it'll be before the majority of frum Jews adopt it for most of their needs.

Expand full comment
Interdweller's avatar

I agree with your point regarding rabbinic hierarchy and our dependency on rabbonim for psak. I heard Rav Schacter say that he'd be fine with AI giving psak - but not sure if he actually meant it. In any case, psychologically, will we allow ourselves to be led by bots? Will the ghost in the machine feel transcendent enough for semi-Devine authority? The Rebbes Igros work for some, maybe AI is next in line. What about the conception of the human self and its relation to God in a Grimian homotechno world. What does a post AI theology look like?

Determinism - I don't see this as a break from the ongoing three century phenomena of people yelling (in the case of Laplace) "I had no need of that hypothesis". Many would claim that this was one of the main drivers of secularism, hence God-of-The-Gaps debates.

Btw, wasn't sure about the weather example. Weather is a classic chaotic system where unpredictability is inherent to the system. The butterfly effect.

Paradoxically, I feel like A(G)I is providing us with more questions than answers.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts